Riobel TMMRD47LPN- 3-way no share Type T/P (thermostatic/pressure balance) coaxial valve trim

Riobel TMMRD47LPN- 3-way no share Type T/P (thermostatic/pressure balance) coaxial valve trim

Marsoni

M251S

$170.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Riobel TMMRD47LPN- 3-way no share Type T/P (thermostatic/pressure balance) coaxial valve trimR45, R45 SPEX or R45 EX rough required to complete Thermostatic pressure balance coaxial cartridge with check valves Trim only 6 positions (OFF, 1, 1 and 2, 2, 2 and 3, 3) share Collection: Momenti SKU: TMMRD47LPN Finish: Polished Nickel UPC Code: 883186173269 Length: 6. 6" Width: 2. 9" Height: 5. 9" Weight: 2. 4 lbs Group: Trims Flow: N A Color Code: PN Warranty: Limited Lifetime Warranty Spec Sheet: View Manufacturer's Page: View Trim Only Shower

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Riobel TMMRD47LPN- 3-way no share Type T/P (thermostatic/pressure balance) coaxial valve trim orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Riobel TMMRD47LPN- 3-way no share Type T/P (thermostatic/pressure balance) coaxial valve trim ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Riobel TMMRD47LPN- 3-way no share Type T/P (thermostatic/pressure balance) coaxial valve trim, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Riobel TMMRD47LPN- 3-way no share Type T/P (thermostatic/pressure balance) coaxial valve trim in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Great fit. Good quality, heavy cotton. I bought it as a substitute for a light jacket… to maybe wear open with a t-shirt. It’s pretty heavy… almost like denim… which was what I wanted. But it’s heavier than what I would wear as a “shirt”. The price was great, so I’d buy it again since it comes in a variety of colors.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 21, 2025

Verified Purchase

Public Name

Los Angeles, US

★★★★★ 1

100% polyester is awful!

Color: Olive Green, Size: Large

As others have pointed out, this used to be 100% cotton and it was great. Sturdy and comfortable, nice worn-in look. Now it’s 100% polyester and it’s terrible. Feels cheap, looks cheap and shiny. Please bring back the cotton shirts.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026

Verified Purchase

TLV

Houston, US

★★★★★ 3

Machine Washable but NOT Machine Dryable!

Seems well made and fits me well (6'2", 196 lb). I like the feel and color. However, contrary to lots of the reviews saying the shirt the received, mine was 100% Polyester. The instructions say machine washable. But upon receiving the item, its label says "do not tumble dry." I intended it for a two week+ cruise where washing it and quick drying will be essential. Drip drying would be very inconvenient.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2026

Verified Purchase

Katrina Doran

Houston, US

★★★★★ 5

Thicker shirt, not jacket or shacket.

Color: Olive Green, Size: Small

It's not a jacket or a shacket-- too thin for that. But it is a thicker shirt, very soft, and could be worn as business/dress or casual. We didn't keep it, because it wasn't what we were looking for, but it's a nice shirt. Bigger than we were hoping for a 10-year-old boy (who is very tall for his age).

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on October 28, 2025

Verified Purchase

Ron Palm

San Leandro, US

★★★★★ 5

LIGHT JACKET

Color: Dark Gray, Size: XX-Large

GREAT LIGHT WEIGHT JACKET

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2026